Do I side with the protagonist or antagonist?


Someone asked me recently which of the characters in The Drawing Lesson I identified with  more: Alexander Wainwright, the representational artist, or Rinaldo, the conceptual artist.

Without question, it’s Alexander.

After all, Alexander paints stunningly beautiful landscapes, which have a quality no one else can create. When you look at his paintings of the English countryside, you see the beyond. So what is that? To me and to his audience, it means he conveys a sense of what lies behind or beyond the everyday world we can see and touch. Alexander has a very strong sense that there is something else lying just out of sight which holds everything together.

Actually, I first started thinking about this quality in painting when I looked at the paintings of the great American artist Edward Hopper. All the lonely people in his cityscapes give me a sense of something lying just beyond or behind the painting. I decided to take that quality and give it to Alexander Wainwright.

Rinaldo is a conceptual artist—not confined to the canvas. He enters a construction called the Destiny of War into the Tate Modern competition for the Turner Prize. This conceptual piece consists of a long trench, with a barbwire fence down the center, and piles of old clothing and children’s toys—guns, model tanks, knives, and swords—all spattered with red paint.

Definitely, the narrator and Alexander’s art dealer, James Helmsworth, is disgusted.

“No doubt, he intended to create the effect of a bloodbath. I found one dismembered doll to be a particularly tasteless touch. In my opinion, the message of this so-called piece of conceptual art was both obvious and trite. But then I, as a dealer in representational painting, had to admit my bias.”

Many galleries show such kinds of work. The point is not to create a thing of beauty, but rather to express a concept, make a statement or create a mood with a wide variety of materials. Aesthetics is not important. Probably the artist Marcel Duchamp, at the beginning of the twentieth century, was one of the very first conceptual artists.

But right from the start, you could tell whose side I was on. But then, I realized I was being far too hard on Rinaldo. I was dismissing the validity of his art forms and holding them up to ridicule. That was the way I felt then. I decided that I needed to soften my views. Last summer, I spent a lot of time going to as many conceptual art exhibits as I could find, not only in Toronto but New York.

At the Whitney in New York, I visited the Dan Graham retrospective. And in Toronto, there was an excellent show on at the Power Plant Gallery with a great variety of work—some of them very effective. I cannot claim that I came to love any of the work, but perhaps I came away with a clearer understanding.

Then the real work began. I went through the manuscript inserting some scenes in which greater understanding of Rinaldo’s work was shown. Such appreciation was put into the voices of Alexander and James Helmsworth. So, I think I achieved a better balance between the visions of the two types of art. It’s a lesson I learned: Don’t let your personal views take over and spoil the story.

You really do have to sympathize a bit with Rinaldo! After all, the Turner prize is awarded for contemporary art, and here’s Alexander with his bucolic paintings winning the prize.

So after all of this, I still came down to identifying much more with Alexander, not only in the type of his art, but his view of the world—which is the subject of another blog.

Advertisements

About Mary E. Martin

Mary E. Martin grew up in Toronto, Canada. After earning an Honors Degree in History at the University of Toronto, she graduated with her law degree from Queens University, Kingston, Ontario. In 1973, she was called to the Bar of Ontario and began the general practice of law in Toronto, with emphasis on real estate, wills and estates and elder-care law. This law practice of more than 30 years was a great inspiration for The Osgoode Trilogy ("Conduct in Question," "Final Paradox" and "A Trial of One.") Her fourth novel, “The Drawing Lesson,” will be the first in the next trilogy, provisionally entitled “The Trilogy of Rmembrance.” She is also a photographer particularly with respect to her travels. She has had two commercial photography shows. Married in 1973, she and her husband live in Toronto. They have three adult children.
This entry was posted in Character development, Writing process and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Do I side with the protagonist or antagonist?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s